Chipster sniffed foul play and a just revealed update proves that the Democrats have mounted carefully choreographed a smear campaign to run their hated nemesis off the high court. [READ ]
Sunday, April 9, 2023
UPDATE - Democrats Trying to Smear Thomas off the Court
Chipster sniffed foul play and a just revealed update proves that the Democrats have mounted carefully choreographed a smear campaign to run their hated nemesis off the high court. [READ ]
Friday, April 7, 2023
Anti Gunners Gunning for Thomas
In what is manifestly a smear campaign that hopes to get Justice Thomas off the high court, the liberal media have let loose a broadside of stories insinuating that Thomas has accepted unethical "gifts" in the form of paid-for holidays from "right wing" billionaires. As the Gazette explains the charge is manifestly bullshit. [read]
Thursday, April 6, 2023
The Rights of Recruits to be issued Arms...
Chipster debunks the ridiculous claim that the Second Amendment only confirmed a right to be issued arms within a militia. [read]
Sunday, April 2, 2023
The Price of a Free Press
Spencer Snyder discusses the media's coverage of mass shootings and urges the adoption of a code of restraint designed to curate the narrative and reduce the chances of copycat crimes.
Chipster thinks it's a bad idea. I don't doubt the existence of a contagion effect, but I am more concerned with a shadowy claque of self-appointed sociologists issuing "do's" and "dont's" about what to report in order to promote some selected "social good" (as determined by the same elite cliques). That is bad enough because it a priori reduces journalism to narrative and mind control. But it gets worse in so far as "social good" inevitably slides into political advantage. Take for example Saint Jacinda the Mournful's suppression of Tarant's "manifesto." She was opposed to his "hateful ideology" and did not want it broadcast. Not only did people not have a right to know what was in the shooter's mind, the NZ government actually prosecuted a kid for the crime of downloading it. If Spencer can find the line between preventing contagion and censoring speech, I'd like to hear it. Flash forward to last week. Our shadow "inner party" has suppressed Aubrey's "manifesto" .... why? To "prevent contagion" or to insulate and protect a trans-gender ideology from being besmirched by the action's of a lunatic?
Fact is a free press is the price we have to pay for having a free press. :)
©
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)