Scumbagging the Second Amendment

Chipster discusses the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal decision in Rahimi v. United States which is become the next high-stakes battle over the Second Amendment. [ READ ]

Supreme Court rules on Affirmative Delusions

The Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (29 June 2023) No. 20-1199 has simplified a proposition which liberals have made very "theoretic and complex" in order to avoid facing the fundamental deficiencies in our economic and cultural life. [ read ]

©

Give Us a People's Court!! (not)

Chipster discusses the latest Demorat call to pack the Court with lackeys subservient to their agenda. [here ]

©

Weaponizing Ignorance

Invoking the "Cleopatra Issue," the New York Slime has opened yet another front in its ongoing corporate-imperialist, woke culture war. [ read ]

©

UPDATE - Democrats Trying to Smear Thomas off the Court

Chipster sniffed foul play and a just revealed update proves that the Democrats have mounted carefully choreographed a smear campaign to run their hated nemesis off the high court. [READ ]

Anti Gunners Gunning for Thomas

In what is manifestly a smear campaign that hopes to get Justice Thomas off the high court, the liberal media have let loose a broadside of stories insinuating that Thomas has accepted unethical "gifts" in the form of paid-for holidays from "right wing" billionaires. As the Gazette explains the charge is manifestly bullshit. [read]

The Rights of Recruits to be issued Arms...

Chipster debunks the ridiculous claim that the Second Amendment only confirmed a right to be issued arms within a militia. [read]

The Price of a Free Press

Spencer Snyder discusses the media's coverage of mass shootings and urges the adoption of a code of restraint designed to curate the narrative and reduce the chances of copycat crimes.

Chipster thinks it's a bad idea. I don't doubt the existence of a contagion effect, but I am more concerned with a shadowy claque of self-appointed sociologists issuing "do's" and "dont's" about what to report in order to promote some selected "social good" (as determined by the same elite cliques). That is bad enough because it a priori reduces journalism to narrative and mind control. But it gets worse in so far as "social good" inevitably slides into political advantage. Take for example Saint Jacinda the Mournful's suppression of Tarant's "manifesto." She was opposed to his "hateful ideology" and did not want it broadcast. Not only did people not have a right to know what was in the shooter's mind, the NZ government actually prosecuted a kid for the crime of downloading it. If Spencer can find the line between preventing contagion and censoring speech, I'd like to hear it. Flash forward to last week. Our shadow "inner party" has suppressed Aubrey's "manifesto" .... why? To "prevent contagion" or to insulate and protect a trans-gender ideology from being besmirched by the action's of a lunatic?

Fact is a free press is the price we have to pay for having a free press. :)

©

More Medicine! More Medicine!

Chipster comments on the latest "mass shooting." [ read ]

©

Still Trying to Sweat?

The Sun reports that King Charles is refusing to pay the £35,000 a year it costs for Prince Andrew's Indian yoga instructor to come to the palace to twist, stretch and massage the prince. ...

Still trying to work up a sweat, eh Andy?
©

Throwing Tulips at Tigers

(or the Right to a Return on one's Labor)

Woodchip examines the impotence of progressive politics. [ read ]

Washington's Latest Fad: Spurious Outrage & the Subversion of Justice

Led by a salivating, sputtering, senawhore Schumer, the Upper Crusti, of both parties and the media have taken after Tucker Carlson for releasing previously suppressed footage of the January 6th riot at the Capitol. Swimming in their own outrage, they are could care less that an innocent man was scapegoated in what is now shown to have been a political show trial. [ read ]

©